RE: Issue: Attribute concatenation/splitting

["Avi Lior" <avi@bridgewatersystems.com>]

Your preaching to the wrong guy.  I think I had a proposal on the table
when RADEXT started to extend the attributes space, and support
attribute segmentation.  Everyone was against it and not for technical
merits but because nobody thought we need to extend or should extend or
enhance etc etc ....
 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barney Wolff [mailto:barney@databus.com] 
> Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 10:03 PM
> To: Avi Lior
> Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Issue: Attribute concatenation/splitting
> 
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 09:54:06PM -0400, Avi Lior wrote:
> > 
> > I understand what your objections.  You are trying to solve the 
> > problem in general.  Nothing wrong with that.
> > 
> > But as a specific solution to a specific problem what I 
> propose will 
> > work. No?
> 
> Sure, but so would any other technique.  That is, until the 
> filter-rule syntax is "enhanced" in some way.
> 
> Regards,
> Barney
> 
> -- 
> Barney Wolff         I never met a computer I didn't like.
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>