Re: paradox

[Barney Wolff <barney@databus.com>]

On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 01:31:11PM -0700, Glen Zorn (gwz) wrote:
> Barney Wolff <> supposedly scribbled:
> 
> > I find it mildly astonishing, listening to today's radext session,
> > that the group seemed to feel that the only problem worth fixing is
> > the 255 limit on AVP type, when just a few minutes before the debate
> > was over what to do with filter/traffic rules that go over the
> > 253-byte limit.    
> > 
> > Apperently people feel that it's preferable to debate this issue
> > every time it comes up, rather than solve it once. 
> 
> If you alleviate the attribute namespace shortage, aren't there established ways of dealing w/overly long values (up to the message size limit anyway)?

I'm always willing to be educated - please point me to a document that
solves the attribute length problem when there can be more than one
of the attribute in the message.

-- 
Barney Wolff         I never met a computer I didn't like.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>