[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Issue: Diameter-RADIUS gateway behavior not completely specified
- To: "Barney Wolff" <barney@databus.com>
- Subject: RE: Issue: Diameter-RADIUS gateway behavior not completely specified
- From: "Glen Zorn \(gwz\)" <gwz@cisco.com>
- Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 16:25:21 -0700
- Authentication-results: sj-dkim-1.cisco.com; header.From=gwz@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com verified; );
- Cc: <radiusext@ops.ietf.org>
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=802; t=1156634723; x=1157498723; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim1002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=gwz@cisco.com; z=From:=22Glen=20Zorn=20\(gwz\)=22=20<gwz@cisco.com> |Subject:RE=3A=20Issue=3A=20Diameter-RADIUS=20gateway=20behavior=20not=20complete ly=20specified; X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3Dm7E3Pmh6ma+lb09sBcSrQ2HAMMo=3D; b=CgQc/9pO6MsXgyBMNxvI7qZV793ID3jAW55ao/y0qZrbM07D31COr4nJD/oHtr1ThSLUeirp 141GMLM5RJrXiffjg8C71AtDTqrd7es8xuyaOjVLC9ukG1eP5N16FRgH;
Barney Wolff <mailto:barney@databus.com> scribbled on Saturday, August
26, 2006 4:00 PM:
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 01:45:00PM -0700, Glen Zorn (gwz) wrote:
>> Barney Wolff <mailto:barney@databus.com> scribbled on Saturday,
>> August 26, 2006 12:34 PM:
>>
>>> I agree that the behavior should be specified. It would seem that
>>> this is an opportunity to take advantage of Diameter's M-bit in
>>> governing the gateway's behavior.
>>
>> Not sure how the M-bit helps. Can you elaborate?
>
> Sorry, I thought it was obvious: An attribute lacking the M-bit may
> legitimately be ignored, so may be eliminated in translation. Not so
> if the M-bit is set.
Right, but RFC 4005 says that the M-bit MUST be set on the
NAS-Filter-Rule AVP...
Hope this helps,
~gwz
--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>