Does anyone see the need for tagged sets of rules, in the same vein that we have tagged sets of tunnel attributes, i.e. as alternative sets of rules?
The goal of this document is to provide the same functionality as the NAS-Filter-Rule AVP in Diameter, which doesn't support alternative rule sets. If there is a need for that feature at all, it can be provided as an extension to the filter rule language itself, without the need for tagging.
-- to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>