[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Issue on filter-rules-01

Maybe they both should be "SHOULD NOT be sent". That way if a Diameter gateway sends both they will both be passed through to RADIUS. 



From: <jouni.korhonen@teliasonera.com>
To: <radiusext@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Issue on filter-rules-01
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 19:17:44 +0100

Hi,

In section 2.5 there's the following text:

         Filter-ID (11) and NAS-Traffic-Rule both define how filters are

         to be applied in the NAS. These attributes are not intended to
         be used concurrently and SHOULD NOT appear in the same RADIUS
         message. Only one type of filtering attribute must be
         processed. If a Filter-ID (11) is present, then the NAS-
         Traffic-Rule MUST be ignored, if present.

I think this text should be align with the equivalent text in
the radext-filter-05 draft. So the text saying
  "..SHOULD NOT appear in the same RADIUS message." should be
  "..MUST NOT appear in the same RADIUS packet." right?

Cheers,
	Jouni

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>




--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>