[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposed Resolution to RFC 3576bis Issue 163: VSA with Disconnect-Request
> So my take is that the omission of vendor-specific attributes from a RFC
> 3576 Disconnect-Request is intentional.
I would agree.
> The proposed resolution is to change the last two paragraphs of Section 3 to
> the following:
> " Where a Service-Type Attribute with value "Authorize Only" is
> included within a CoA-Request, attributes representing an
> authorization change MUST NOT be included;
On first reading, that could be interpreted as "when asking for
change of authorization, authorization changes are not permitted". I
suggest adding text stating what it means to have CoA-Request without
authorization changes. I'm not sure what to suggest, though.
to unsubscribe send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.