RE: [owner-aaa-doctors@ops.ietf.org: BOUNCE aaa-doctors@ops.ietf. org: Non-member submission from [Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>]]

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

> > Hope this helps/explains.
> >
> > So from Ralph's posting, it sounded as if all issues had been discussed
> > already. Do any AAA-doctors believe that the discussions were not processed
> > or handled properly? Or is it that we have a different point of view that
> > seems to not be in sync with the (claimed) WG consensus?
> 
> The issues raised by the AAA Doctors relate to the draft's implications
> for RADIUS, not DHCP.  Perhaps Ralph is referring to a discussion of RFC
> 3396 applicability to DHCP Relay Options.  However, I was not able to find
> a discussion of the RADIUS implications on the DHC WG list.  
> In any case, is DHC WG the right place to discuss those RADIUS implications?
> 
I would say that if we (as AAA-doctors) have a common view of issues w.r.t
the RADIUS implications, then YES it would be appropriate to discuss
the issue on the DHC mailing list to try and convince that WG (all
its members) that they have issues and to try and help them come to
an acceptable resolution.

That is how I try to work things with the MIB doctors as well.

Bert