RE: draft-ietf-lemonade-catenate-05.txt review (Was: Re: Pls revi ew documents on IESG Agenda for September 1, 2005)

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

Thanks Jari.
I will check and handle.

Bert

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jari Arkko [mailto:jari.arkko@piuha.net]
> Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 06:59
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); presnick@qualcomm.com
> Cc: Aaa-Doctors (E-mail); hardie@qualcomm.com
> Subject: draft-ietf-lemonade-catenate-05.txt review (Was: Re: 
> Pls review
> documents on IESG Agenda for September 1, 2005)
> 
> 
> Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> 
> >     - draft-ietf-lemonade-catenate-05.txt
> >       Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) CATENATE 
> Extension (Proposed 
> >       Standard) 
> >    Token: Ted Hardie
> >  
> >
> I read this draft. It looks OK to me. However, in the ABNF:
> 
> >    append-data =/ "CATENATE" SP "(" cat-part *(SP cat-part) ")"
> >
> >    cat-part = text-literal / url
> >
> >    text-literal = "TEXT" SP literal
> >
> >    url = "URL" SP astring
> >
> >    resp-text-code =/ toobig_response_code / badurl_response_code
> >
> >    toobig_response_code = "TOOBIG"
> >
> >    badurl_response_code = "BADURL" SP url-resp-text
> >
> >    url-resp-text = 1*(%x01-09 /
> >                       %x0B-0C /
> >                       %x0E-5B /
> >                       %x5D-FE) ; Any TEXT-CHAR except "]"
> >
> >    capability =/ "CATENATE"
> 
> the ABNF compiler reports that "_" is not a legal character
> in a rulename. Suggest s/_/-/ Or has this been changed in
> some new RFC that I don't know about? If so, maybe the
> tools should be updated too.
> 
> --Jari
>