[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: draft-ietf-lemonade-catenate-05.txt review (Was: Re: Pls revi ew documents on IESG Agenda for September 1, 2005)
Jari,
A DISCUSS was raised for this same issues has been raised
by Scott Hollenbeck (one of the APPS ADs).
So I am going to assume that that
DISCUSS will result in a fix.
Bert
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jari Arkko [mailto:jari.arkko@piuha.net]
> Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 06:59
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); presnick@qualcomm.com
> Cc: Aaa-Doctors (E-mail); hardie@qualcomm.com
> Subject: draft-ietf-lemonade-catenate-05.txt review (Was: Re:
> Pls review
> documents on IESG Agenda for September 1, 2005)
>
>
> Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
>
> > - draft-ietf-lemonade-catenate-05.txt
> > Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) CATENATE
> Extension (Proposed
> > Standard)
> > Token: Ted Hardie
> >
> >
> I read this draft. It looks OK to me. However, in the ABNF:
>
> > append-data =/ "CATENATE" SP "(" cat-part *(SP cat-part) ")"
> >
> > cat-part = text-literal / url
> >
> > text-literal = "TEXT" SP literal
> >
> > url = "URL" SP astring
> >
> > resp-text-code =/ toobig_response_code / badurl_response_code
> >
> > toobig_response_code = "TOOBIG"
> >
> > badurl_response_code = "BADURL" SP url-resp-text
> >
> > url-resp-text = 1*(%x01-09 /
> > %x0B-0C /
> > %x0E-5B /
> > %x5D-FE) ; Any TEXT-CHAR except "]"
> >
> > capability =/ "CATENATE"
>
> the ABNF compiler reports that "_" is not a legal character
> in a rulename. Suggest s/_/-/ Or has this been changed in
> some new RFC that I don't know about? If so, maybe the
> tools should be updated too.
>
> --Jari
>