[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-ietf-lemonade-catenate-05.txt review (Was: Re: Pls revi ew documents on IESG Agenda for September 1, 2005)

Ok. --Jari

Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:

Jari,

A DISCUSS was raised for this same issues has been raised
by Scott Hollenbeck (one of the APPS ADs). So I am going to assume that that
DISCUSS will result in a fix.

Bert



-----Original Message-----
From: Jari Arkko [mailto:jari.arkko@piuha.net]
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 06:59
To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); presnick@qualcomm.com
Cc: Aaa-Doctors (E-mail); hardie@qualcomm.com
Subject: draft-ietf-lemonade-catenate-05.txt review (Was: Re: Pls review
documents on IESG Agenda for September 1, 2005)


Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:



- draft-ietf-lemonade-catenate-05.txt
Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) CATENATE

Extension (Proposed

Standard) Token: Ted Hardie




I read this draft. It looks OK to me. However, in the ABNF:



  append-data =/ "CATENATE" SP "(" cat-part *(SP cat-part) ")"

  cat-part = text-literal / url

  text-literal = "TEXT" SP literal

  url = "URL" SP astring

  resp-text-code =/ toobig_response_code / badurl_response_code

  toobig_response_code = "TOOBIG"

  badurl_response_code = "BADURL" SP url-resp-text

  url-resp-text = 1*(%x01-09 /
                     %x0B-0C /
                     %x0E-5B /
                     %x5D-FE) ; Any TEXT-CHAR except "]"

capability =/ "CATENATE"


the ABNF compiler reports that "_" is not a legal character
in a rulename. Suggest s/_/-/ Or has this been changed in
some new RFC that I don't know about? If so, maybe the
tools should be updated too.

--Jari