[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: draft-ietf-lemonade-catenate-05.txt review (Was: Re: Pls review documents on IESG Agenda for September 1, 2005)

To: Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>
Subject: RE: draft-ietf-lemonade-catenate-05.txt review (Was: Re: Pls review documents on IESG Agenda for September 1, 2005)
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:48:45 -0500
Cc: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>, Glenn Parsons <gparsons@nortel.com>, Eric Burger <eburger@brooktrout.com>, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, "Aaa-Doctors (E-mail)" <aaa-doctors@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <p06230905bf3a6bef91c1@[192.168.1.4]>
References: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B15507EE05FA@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com> <p07000c01bf3a67a30f1d@[10.0.2.3]> <p06230905bf3a6bef91c1@[192.168.1.4]>

On 8/30/05 at 1:06 PM -0700, Ted Hardie wrote:

the ABNF compiler reports that "_" is not a legal character in a rulename. Suggest s/_/-/
Would you be okay with this being done in an RFC Editor note? Seems like an easy enough thing to fix that way.


Absolutely.

Would anyone scream if this got handled in AUTH48? I believe that the RFC Editor will handle it if the new ABNF doc is already out, but the authors can check in AUTH48. Obviously, if this somehow beats 2234bis out, the 2234 reference is still valid.


Works for me.

pr
--
Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
QUALCOMM Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102

References:
- RE: draft-ietf-lemonade-catenate-05.txt review (Was: Re: Pls revi ew documents on IESG Agenda for September 1, 2005)
  - From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
- RE: draft-ietf-lemonade-catenate-05.txt review (Was: Re: Pls review documents on IESG Agenda for September 1, 2005)
  - From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>
- RE: draft-ietf-lemonade-catenate-05.txt review (Was: Re: Pls review documents on IESG Agenda for September 1, 2005)
  - From: Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>

Prev by Date: RE: draft-ietf-lemonade-catenate-05.txt review (Was: Re: Pls review documents on IESG Agenda for September 1, 2005)
Next by Date: Please Review: Documents on IESG Agenda for September 15, 2005
Previous by thread: RE: draft-ietf-lemonade-catenate-05.txt review (Was: Re: Pls review documents on IESG Agenda for September 1, 2005)
Next by thread: Please Review: Documents on IESG Agenda for September 15, 2005
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread