[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-ietf-mpls-lc-if-mib-06.txt review (Was: Re: Please Revi ew: Documents on IESG Agenda for September 15, 2005)


    I have made a note locally.

    --Tom

Thanks Jari.

I am sure that the authors and RFC-Editor will catch them
during AUTH48. But authors, pls make a not of this so
you will remember when we get to that point.

For completeness, I will post it as a comment in the ID-tracker.

Bert


-----Original Message-----
From: Jari Arkko [mailto:jari.arkko@piuha.net]
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 10:16
To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); Alex Zinin; tnadeau@cisco.com
Cc: Aaa-Doctors (E-mail)
Subject: draft-ietf-mpls-lc-if-mib-06.txt review (Was: Re: Please
Review: Documents on IESG Agenda for September 15, 2005)


Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:


 o draft-ietf-mpls-lc-if-mib-06.txt
   Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label-Controlled

ATM and Frame-Relay

   Management Interface Definition (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 3
   Token: Alex Zinin



I reviewed this draft. It looks OK, but I'll admit that I know
very little about MPLS. Some nits were found, however:


        is capabile of ATM VC merge, otherwise it MUST


s/capabile/capable/


        MPLS-related configuration and/or performanc statistics.


s/performanc/performance/


        LSR is willing to accept unlabled traffic


s/unlabled/unlabeled/


        where possible.  Specifically,SNMPv3 VACM and USM MUST be


s/,/, /

--Jari