RE: draft-ietf-mpls-lc-if-mib-06.txt review (Was: Re: Please Revi ew: Documents on IESG Agenda for September 15, 2005)

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

Thanks Jari.

I am sure that the authors and RFC-Editor will catch them
during AUTH48. But authors, pls make a not of this so
you will remember when we get to that point.

For completeness, I will post it as a comment in the ID-tracker.

Bert

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jari Arkko [mailto:jari.arkko@piuha.net]
> Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 10:16
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); Alex Zinin; tnadeau@cisco.com
> Cc: Aaa-Doctors (E-mail)
> Subject: draft-ietf-mpls-lc-if-mib-06.txt review (Was: Re: Please
> Review: Documents on IESG Agenda for September 15, 2005)
> 
> 
> Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> 
> >  o draft-ietf-mpls-lc-if-mib-06.txt
> >    Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label-Controlled 
> ATM and Frame-Relay 
> >    Management Interface Definition (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 3 
> >    Token: Alex Zinin
> >  
> >
> I reviewed this draft. It looks OK, but I'll admit that I know
> very little about MPLS. Some nits were found, however:
> 
> >         is capabile of ATM VC merge, otherwise it MUST
> 
> s/capabile/capable/
> 
> >         MPLS-related configuration and/or performanc statistics. 
> 
> s/performanc/performance/
> 
> >         LSR is willing to accept unlabled traffic
> 
> s/unlabled/unlabeled/
> 
> >         where possible.  Specifically,SNMPv3 VACM and USM MUST be 
> 
> s/,/, /
> 
> --Jari
>