Re: I'm back on CERN

[Steve Glines <sglines@is-cs.com>]

Here's my report from the same time period:

2000-10-17T05:20 SUCCESS 15 372.902
embratel-fapesp.NewYork.cw.net/aroot.psg.com
# 14  embratel-fapesp.NewYork.cw.net (204.189.136.146)  537.498 ms 
499.975 ms
404.512 ms
# 15  aroot.psg.com (192.83.230.1)  405.053 ms  492.805 ms *
2000-10-17T05:40 FAILURE 15 405.053 aroot.psg.com
2000-10-17T06:00 SUCCESS 15 (192.83.230.1)
embratel-fapesp.NewYork.cw.net/*
2000-10-17T06:20 SUCCESS 15 559.972
embratel-fapesp.NewYork.cw.net/aroot.psg.com


Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
> 
> since the Oct 13, 16:47 sample, I am using CERN again.
> 
> Note: I added code to the script that emits the last 2 traceroute lines when
> it signals "failure". It shows that the so-far-seen reason for "failure" is packet
> loss, not downtime - if the last of the 3 pings is lost, it doesn't find its "ms" marker.
> 
>           Harald
> 
> 2000-10-13T13:47 SUCCESS 26 768.242 embratel-fapesp.NewYork.cw.net
> # 25  embratel-fapesp.NewYork.cw.net (204.189.136.154)  761.297 ms  696.530 ms  732.
> 194 ms
> # 26  aroot.psg.com (192.83.230.1)  760.570 ms  715.416 ms *
> 2000-10-13T14:47 FAILURE 26 760.570 aroot.psg.com
> 2000-10-13T15:47 SUCCESS 26 733.724 embratel-fapesp.NewYork.cw.net/aroot.psg.com
> # 25  embratel-fapesp.NewYork.cw.net (204.189.136.154)  771.862 ms  726.326 ms  764.
> 439 ms
> # 26  aroot.psg.com (192.83.230.1)  738.737 ms  752.331 ms *
> 2000-10-13T16:47 FAILURE 26 738.737 aroot.psg.com
> 2000-10-13T17:47 SUCCESS 26 762.659 embratel-fapesp.NewYork.cw.net/aroot.psg.com
> 2000-10-13T18:47 SUCCESS 25 89.248 swiCE1-A1-0-0-1.switch.ch/mbone-cern.switch.ch
> --
> Harald Tveit Alvestrand, alvestrand@cisco.com
> +47 41 44 29 94
> Personal email: Harald@Alvestrand.no