You wrote:
"We evaluated the volunteers with the ADs, TAs and TEWG chairs and we decided to compose the team..."
May I ask what was your evaluation criteria?
Mina Azad
ATM/IP OAM Standards Specialist
Nortel Networks
mazad@nortelnetworks.com
1-613-763-2044 (ESN 393-2044)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:bwijnen@lucent.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 4:49 PM
> To: ccamp-wg
> Cc: Scott Bradner
> Subject: TE-WG Design Team
>
>
> All,
>
> > We had a great response to our call for volunteers - 27
> people sent in
> > their names and indicated their readyness to help. As
> noted in RFC 2418
> > sec 6.5 design teams work best when they are small so we
> could not accept
> > everyone who offered their services. We evaluated the
> volunteers with the
> > ADs, TAs and TEWG chairs and we decided to compose the team
> as follows:
> >
> Ed Kern, ejk@tech.org (chair).
> > Malin Carlzon, malin@sunet.se
> Tim Griffin, griffin@research.att.com
> Tom Reddington, treddington@bell-labs.com
> Chris Liljenstolpe, chris@cw.net
> Wai Sum Lai, wlai@att.com
> Longsong Lin, llin@mmcnet.com
> Dave McDysan, dave.mcdysan@wcom.com
> Rob Coltun, rcoltun@redback.com
>
> > We thank everyone who volunteered for their willingness to
> serve. we also
> > want to remind everyone (including the design team) that, as noted
> > in the same section of RFC 2418, "The output of a design
> team is always
> > subject to approval, rejection or modification by the WG as
> a whole."
> > i.e. being on the design team means that the rest of the WG
> will get to
> > comment on their work without having to put in the original effort.
> >
> > We will be sending out a formal charge to the designe team
> in the next few
> > days and expect that they will produce an Internet Draft
> (well) before
> > the ID cutoff for the London IETF meeting.
> >
> > Bert & Scott
> >
>
>