Re: OLI requirements

[Andre Fredette <fredette@photonex.com>]

I may be a bit biased given that I'm one of the authors, but here are my 
opinions:

At 06:21 PM 6/18/2001 -0700, Kireeti Kompella wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>A document on Optical Link Interface Requirements has been submitted
>(URL: http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-many-oli-reqts-00.txt )
>
>Please review the draft and comment (to _this_ list) on the following:
>1) Are the requirements stated useful?

Yes.

>2) Are there useful requirements that are missing?

Possibly.

>3) Do you think that this document should be a CCAMP WG document?
>    a) as it stands today?
>    b) only if it changed?
>    c) no, no matter what surgery is done on it?
>    d) yawn ...

a)


>Extra points for terse, technical and temperate comments.
>
>We'd like to judge the sentiment towards this draft in a week or two,
>so if you'd like your comments to be acted upon, send them soon.
>
>Thanks,
>Kireeti & Vijay.