[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: OLI requirements
- To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
- Subject: RE: OLI requirements
- From: Ayan Banerjee <abanerjee@calient.net>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 11:29:27 -0700
- Delivery-date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 11:35:50 -0700
- Envelope-to: ccamp-data@psg.com
I beleive that this should be CCAMP WG document.
Thanks,
Ayan
-----Original Message-----
From: Andre Fredette [mailto:fredette@photonex.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 10:47 AM
To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: OLI requirements
I may be a bit biased given that I'm one of the authors, but here are my
opinions:
At 06:21 PM 6/18/2001 -0700, Kireeti Kompella wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>A document on Optical Link Interface Requirements has been submitted
>(URL: http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-many-oli-reqts-00.txt )
>
>Please review the draft and comment (to _this_ list) on the following:
>1) Are the requirements stated useful?
Yes.
>2) Are there useful requirements that are missing?
Possibly.
>3) Do you think that this document should be a CCAMP WG document?
> a) as it stands today?
> b) only if it changed?
> c) no, no matter what surgery is done on it?
> d) yawn ...
a)
>Extra points for terse, technical and temperate comments.
>
>We'd like to judge the sentiment towards this draft in a week or two,
>so if you'd like your comments to be acted upon, send them soon.
>
>Thanks,
>Kireeti & Vijay.