RE: Optical Link Interface

[Andre Fredette <fredette@photonex.com>]

That's a very interesting analogy.

Andre

At 02:04 PM 7/25/2001 -0700, Kireeti Kompella wrote:
>In an ideal world, CR-LDP as an extension of LDP would have been
>the way to go.  It's funny that you should be arguing on the other
>side now -- let's do NTIP (read RSVP-TE) instead of LMP-WDM (read
>CR-LDP) which is just an extension of LMP (read LDP) which nobody
>needs anyway (read "TE is the only MPLS app").  Such is life ...