RE: Drafts update

["Hirokazu Ishimatsu" <hirokazu@japan-telecom.co.jp>]

Kireeti,

My opinion is :
 
 1. draft-dubuc-lmp-mib-02.txt - Yes
 2. draft-fontana-ccamp-gmpls-g709-00.txt - Yes
 3. draft-kompella-ospf-gmpls-extensions-02.txt - Yes
 4. draft-many-ccamp-gmpls-framework-00.txt - Yes
 5. draft-mannie-ccamp-gmpls-concatenation-conversion-00.txt - Wait
 6. draft-many-ccamp-gmpls-routing-00.txt - Yes
 
Best regards,
Hirokazu Ishimatsu

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org]On
> Behalf Of Kireeti Kompella
> Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2001 5:37 AM
> To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Drafts update
> 
> 
> Hi Folks,
> 
> Can we get a sense of the consensus whether the following drafts
> should be made CCAMP WG documents?  Please respond with
> (a) yes
> (b) no
> (c) wait
> 
> 1. draft-dubuc-lmp-mib-02.txt
> 2. draft-fontana-ccamp-gmpls-g709-00.txt
> 3. draft-kompella-ospf-gmpls-extensions-02.txt
> 5. draft-mannie-ccamp-gmpls-concatenation-conversion-00.txt
> 6. draft-many-ccamp-gmpls-routing-00.txt
> 
> (Note: for draft-dubuc-lmp-mib-02.txt, the question is, should this
>  be a WG document, either in MPLS or CCAMP.)
> 
> Thanks,
> Kireeti.
> 
>