Re: Drafts update

[Matt Squire <mattsquire@acm.org>]

More votes...

Yes          draft-dubuc-lmp-mib-02.txt
Don't know   draft-fontana-ccamp-gmpls-g709-00.txt 
Yes          draft-kompella-ospf-gmpls-extensions-02.txt 
Yes          draft-many-ccamp-gmpls-framework-00.txt
Don't know   draft-mannie-ccamp-gmpls-concatenation-conversion-00.txt 
Yes          draft-many-ccamp-gmpls-routing-00.txt 


> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org]On
> > Behalf Of Kireeti Kompella
> > Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2001 5:37 AM
> > To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> > Subject: Drafts update
> >
> >
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > Can we get a sense of the consensus whether the following drafts
> > should be made CCAMP WG documents?  Please respond with
> > (a) yes
> > (b) no
> > (c) wait
> >
> > 1. draft-dubuc-lmp-mib-02.txt
> > 2. draft-fontana-ccamp-gmpls-g709-00.txt
> > 3. draft-kompella-ospf-gmpls-extensions-02.txt
> > 5. draft-mannie-ccamp-gmpls-concatenation-conversion-00.txt
> > 6. draft-many-ccamp-gmpls-routing-00.txt
> >
> > (Note: for draft-dubuc-lmp-mib-02.txt, the question is, should this
> >  be a WG document, either in MPLS or CCAMP.)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Kireeti.
> >
> >