CCAMP WG action items

[Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>]

1) Final round of WG comments on GMPLS signalling drafts by August 27.
   These include:
   draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-cr-ldp-04.txt
   draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-rsvp-te-04.txt
   draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-signaling-05.txt
   draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-01.txt
   
   At that point, the authors (editors) incorporate the comments, and
   the documents go to IETF Last Call.

   The pieces of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-01.txt that get
   taken out are to be put in another draft that will be a CCAMP WG
   _informational_ document.  When Eric submits this draft, we'll have
   a three week WG Last Call on it.
 
2) G.709: move non-ITU-standard stuff into a separate document.

3) Reissue routing docs as CCAMP WG docs:
   draft-kompella-ospf-gmpls-extensions-02.txt
   draft-many-ccamp-gmpls-routing-00.txt

4) For each of the following, do you think:
   a. draft-mannie-ccamp-gmpls-concatenation-conversion-00.txt
   b. draft-fontana-ccamp-gmpls-g709-00.txt
	(assuming that the non-ITU stuff is removed)
   c. draft-many-ccamp-gmpls-framework-00.txt
   d. draft-bonica-tunneltrace-01.txt

   should these be made CCAMP WG docs or not?

   Also, for (c), do you think that a GMPLS framework doc is useful?

5) Tom and co-authors to send mail to the list stating the degree
   of independence of LMP MIB to the MPLS TE MIB complex.

6) Consensus: don't move forward with NTIP; move forward with LMP-WDM,
   subject to due diligence that this work belongs in the IETF.

7) Once new versions of the following drafts appear, we will have WG
   Last Call on them:
	draft-bms-optical-sdhsonet-mpls-control-frmwrk-01.txt
	draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-00.txt
	draft-many-gmpls-architecture-01.txt

Kireeti.