[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Moving right along ... Switching Type
Dimitri,
> We have two approaches either "traffic-parameters" are used
> (in SENDER_TSPEC) then i think the Switching Type capability
> is useless or they aren't then such field could be optionaly
> used when applicable (some examples are given in the routing
> document).
>
> Wouldn't be the right way to proceed by defining an "unknown"
> or "unspecified" value used when "traffic-parameters" are
> included within the Path Message and optional use the ones
> proposed in the current version of the specification when they
> aren't. This field is thus optional and MUST only be used when
> traffic parameters are not defined. I think this solves both
> approaches.
Agreed.
Yakov.