[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

position of ADMIN_STATUS object in RESV message



Hi,
Section 10.1 of draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-rsvp-te-05.txt describes the
admin_status as not being a 
part of the <flow descriptor list> in the RESV message. 
This works fine for the FF style of reservation.
But for the SE style of reservation if just one filter is taken out by
setting the D bit in admin status, 
all others must go down because the admin_status applies for the entire RESV
instead of just the particular
filter in question. 
Or for that matter if only one filter's state(LSP) is taken administratively
down( by setting A bit), it will now apply to all filters
Is this intended? Or is it the optical world will never do SE style
reservations? Am I missing something here?
-Sayan