[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FW: Questions on draft-ietf-mpls-bundle-00

To: "Karmakar, Soumen" <soumen@trillium.com>
Subject: Re: FW: Questions on draft-ietf-mpls-bundle-00
From: Yakov Rekhter <yakov@juniper.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 11:05:34 -0800
cc: "'ccamp@ops.ietf.org'" <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 16 Nov 2001 16:53:36 PST." <F1CE15E08172D4119247009027AE9D500788A7C6@FMSMSX37>

Soumen,

> Was there a decision taken on this and reflected in drafts (or to come) of
> the removal of COMPONENT_IF_UPSTREAM ? Or that the type is supported and may
> not be used. The UNI specifications mandates that both upstream and
> downstream component id must be specified for bidirectional connection. Will
> these also be reflected in the OUNI (oif2000.125.7) specification ?

see draft-ietf-mpls-bundle-01.txt

Yakov.

References:
- RE: FW: Questions on draft-ietf-mpls-bundle-00
  - From: "Karmakar, Soumen" <soumen@trillium.com>

Prev by Date: I-D ACTION:draft-many-inference-srlg-02.txt
Next by Date: SE style of reservation in GMPLS
Prev by thread: RE: FW: Questions on draft-ietf-mpls-bundle-00
Next by thread: Re: FW: Questions on draft-ietf-mpls-bundle-00
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread