Re: AW: VC-4-64c as forwarding adjacency

["manoj juneja" <manojkumarjuneja@hotmail.com>]

Hi Kireeti,

          I was thinking from the point of view that routing advertisement 
of VC-4-64c as a FA should not be allowed.

Regards,
manoj.


>From: Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>
>To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org, juergen.heiles@icn.siemens.de,   
>manojkumarjuneja@hotmail.com
>Subject: Re: AW: VC-4-64c as forwarding adjacency
>Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 15:00:59 -0800 (PST)
>
> >             Does this mean the forwarding adjacency concept is not
> > applicable to concatenated signals/LSPs ?
>
>Instead of misrepresenting FAs, why don't you read Juergen's mail again?
>
>Juergen wrote:
>
> >No, that is not possible as you cannot transport a VC-4 in a VC-4-64c. A
> >VC-4-64c only supports dat clients like ATM, IP, Ethernet.
>
>Nothing to do with FAs.  Everything to do with VC-4-64c, emphasis on c.
>
>Kireeti.


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp