RE: draft-bonica-tunneltrace-02

[Shahram Davari <Shahram_Davari@pmc-sierra.com>]

Please refer to previous emails by me and David Allan. Most of them are listed there.

-Shahram

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas D. Nadeau [mailto:tnadeau@cisco.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 9:24 AM
> To: Shahram Davari
> Cc: 'Randy Bush'; Cuevas, Enrique G, ALASO; ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: draft-bonica-tunneltrace-02
> 
> 
> 
> >It has serious security, complexity, backward compatibility 
> and layer 
> >violation issues.
> 
>          Can you elaborate on what you think these are?
> 
>          --Tom
> 
> 
> 
> >-Shahram
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy@research.att.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 8:56 AM
> > > To: Shahram Davari
> > > Cc: Cuevas, Enrique G, ALASO; ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> > > Subject: RE: draft-bonica-tunneltrace-02
> > >
> > >
> > > > Are you suggesting that any draft that falls in the
> > > charter, no matter how
> > > > good or bad it is, MUST become a WG document?
> > >
> > > one can imagine extreme cases of any principle.  one can also
> > > just get to
> > > work.
> > >
> > > randy
> > >
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time. 
>