RE: draft-bonica-tunneltrace-02

[Shahram Davari <Shahram_Davari@pmc-sierra.com>]

What is missing here is that the discussions with the AUTHOR on the list indicate that many of the concerns are being addressed in the next revision. Can we simply agree that Ron's next version be the basis for this discussion. 

-Shahram


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shahram Davari 
> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 9:25 AM
> To: 'Thomas D. Nadeau'
> Cc: 'Randy Bush'; Cuevas, Enrique G, ALASO; ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: draft-bonica-tunneltrace-02
> 
> 
> Please refer to previous emails by me and David Allan. Most 
> of them are listed there.
> 
> -Shahram
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thomas D. Nadeau [mailto:tnadeau@cisco.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 9:24 AM
> > To: Shahram Davari
> > Cc: 'Randy Bush'; Cuevas, Enrique G, ALASO; ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> > Subject: RE: draft-bonica-tunneltrace-02
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > >It has serious security, complexity, backward compatibility 
> > and layer 
> > >violation issues.
> > 
> >          Can you elaborate on what you think these are?
> > 
> >          --Tom
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > >-Shahram
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy@research.att.com]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 8:56 AM
> > > > To: Shahram Davari
> > > > Cc: Cuevas, Enrique G, ALASO; ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> > > > Subject: RE: draft-bonica-tunneltrace-02
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Are you suggesting that any draft that falls in the
> > > > charter, no matter how
> > > > > good or bad it is, MUST become a WG document?
> > > >
> > > > one can imagine extreme cases of any principle.  one can also
> > > > just get to
> > > > work.
> > > >
> > > > randy
> > > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----------
> > Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time. 
> > 
>