RE: WG document status

[Sasha Vainshtein <Sasha@AXERRA.com>]

Scott,
Thank you for clarification.

With best regards,
                                   Sasha Vainshtein
email:     sasha@axerra.com <mailto:sasha@axerra.com> 
tel:       +972-3-7659993 (office)
           +972-8-9254948 (res.)
           +972-58-674833 (cell.)
 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Bradner [mailto:sob@harvard.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 6:23 PM
> To: loa.andersson@utfors.se; mlazer@att.com; Sasha@AXERRA.com
> Cc: afferton@att.com; bwijnen@lucent.com; ccamp@ops.ietf.org; 
> dbrungard@att.com; gash@att.com; yakov@juniper.net
> Subject: RE: WG document status
> 
> 
> > Does not RFC 2026 overrule the previous requirements, 
> 
> the pp in 2026 you note gives the IESG (backing up a AD for example)
> flexibility to support the type of thing that the routing AD did
> 
> from 2026 sec 4.1.1
>    The IESG may require implementation and/or operational experience
>    prior to granting Proposed Standard status to a specification that
>    materially affects the core Internet protocols or that specifies
>    behavior that may have significant operational impact on the 
>    Internet.
> 
> Scott
>