[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Repost: Use of Unnumbered Interface ID

To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Repost: Use of Unnumbered Interface ID
From: "Michael I Mandelberg(Isaac)" <mmandelberg@fwion.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 11:25:57 -0400

draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-unnum-07.txt states that:

   With this in mind, the ERO processing in the presence of the
   Unnumbered Interface ID subobject follows the rules specified in
   section 4.3.4.1 of [RSVP-TE].

If the Unnumbered Interface ID subobject is used, is the IPv4 Prefix
subobject defined in 3209 still required?

Thanks

Michael Mandelberg

FirstWave SION

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Repost: Use of Unnumbered Interface ID
  - From: Yakov Rekhter <yakov@juniper.net>

Prev by Date: Re: No Upstream Uni-directional LSPs?
Next by Date: Re: Repost: Use of Unnumbered Interface ID
Previous by thread: call and connection separation
Next by thread: Re: Repost: Use of Unnumbered Interface ID
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread