Re: draft-kawakami-mpls-lsp-vlan-00.txt

[Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>]

Hi All,

One high-level comment, and one addressing the issue that Dimitri
raised;

The CCAMP WG deals (mostly) with protocol extensions that are *common*
across a variety of technologies, such as GMPLS signaling and routing,
and LMP.  There are cases of doing specific technology work, such as
SDH, only because there is no WG for that work.  The WG chairs would
have to consult with their ADs to figure out the right home for this
work that seems to me to be specific.

> thus i am bit surprised this i-d proposes the use
> of cr-ldp, for instance:

Any i-d can propose anything :-)  If it is to be a WG doc, then
the CR-LDP parts will have to be reviewed.  If it is to be Standards
Track, the CR-LDP parts will have to be removed -- if they stay in,
the doc will at best be put on Info track.

Kireeti.