[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Last Call: Routing Extensions in Support of Generalized MPLS to Proposed Standard

To: "Varma, Eve L (Eve)" <evarma@lucent.com>
Subject: RE: Last Call: Routing Extensions in Support of Generalized MPLS to Proposed Standard
From: Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 14:41:20 -0800 (PST)
Cc: George Newsome <gnewsome@ieee.org>, ccamp <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <61B49BC6DA0DDE40957FB499E1835E3705FA83C6@nj7460exch010u.ho.lucent.com>
References: <61B49BC6DA0DDE40957FB499E1835E3705FA83C6@nj7460exch010u.ho.lucent.com>

On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Varma, Eve L (Eve) wrote:

> Hi Kireeti,
>
> I thought the technical comments George made re your input to Jonathan
> were reasonable.  Would you be willing to respond to those?  Some further
> discussion would be quite useful.

Sure, Eve.  Will George repost without the intro?

Kireeti.

References:
- RE: Last Call: Routing Extensions in Support of Generalized MPLS to Proposed Standard
  - From: "Varma, Eve L (Eve)" <evarma@lucent.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Last Call: Routing Extensions in Support of Generalized MPLS vto Proposed Standard
Next by Date: Re: Last Call: Routing Extensions in Support of Generalized MPLSvto Proposed Standard
Previous by thread: RE: Last Call: Routing Extensions in Support of Generalized MPLS to Proposed Standard
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread