[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-andersson-mpls-g-chng-proc-00.txt

To: Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>
Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-andersson-mpls-g-chng-proc-00.txt
From: Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 14:46:48 -0500
Cc: Shahram Davari <Shahram_Davari@pmc-sierra.com>, "'Mark.Jones@mail.sprint.com'" <Mark.Jones@mail.sprint.com>, ccamp@ops.ietf.org, mpls@UU.NET
In-reply-to: <18057706577.20030305113734@psg.com>
Mail-followup-to: Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com>,Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>,Shahram Davari <Shahram_Davari@pmc-sierra.com>,"'Mark.Jones@mail.sprint.com'" <Mark.Jones@mail.sprint.com>,ccamp@ops.ietf.org, mpls@UU.NET
References: <4B6D09F3B826D411A67300D0B706EFDEB03D60@nt-exch-yow.pmc-sierra.bc.ca> <18057706577.20030305113734@psg.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 11:37:34AM -0800, Alex Zinin allegedly wrote:
> Wednesday, March 5, 2003, 11:12:10 AM, Shahram Davari wrote:
> [...]
> > It might be a good idea to require that all IETF protocols support
> > vendor-specific extensions, so that they could be used by other SDOs
> > and for experiments.
> 
> Ouch... draft-iesg-vendor-extensions-00.txt

But that doesn't solve the problem.  There are some protocol
requirements that can't be met just by extra semantics.

References:
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-andersson-mpls-g-chng-proc-00.txt
  - From: Shahram Davari <Shahram_Davari@pmc-sierra.com>
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-andersson-mpls-g-chng-proc-00.txt
  - From: Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>

Prev by Date: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-andersson-mpls-g-chng-proc-00.txt
Next by Date: RE: I-D ACTION:draft-andersson-mpls-g-chng-proc-00.txt
Previous by thread: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-andersson-mpls-g-chng-proc-00.txt
Next by thread: RE: I-D ACTION:draft-andersson-mpls-g-chng-proc-00.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread