[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: I-D ACTION:draft-andersson-mpls-g-chng-proc-00.txt

To: "'Scott W Brim'" <sbrim@cisco.com>, Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>
Subject: RE: I-D ACTION:draft-andersson-mpls-g-chng-proc-00.txt
From: Shahram Davari <Shahram_Davari@pmc-sierra.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 11:54:34 -0800
Cc: "'Mark.Jones@mail.sprint.com'" <Mark.Jones@mail.sprint.com>, ccamp@ops.ietf.org, mpls@UU.NET

>> > It might be a good idea to require that all IETF protocols support
>> > vendor-specific extensions, so that they could be used by 
>other SDOs
>> > and for experiments.
>> 
>> Ouch... draft-iesg-vendor-extensions-00.txt
>
>But that doesn't solve the problem.  There are some protocol
>requirements that can't be met just by extra semantics.
>

Could you please give an example. 

-Shahram

Follow-Ups:
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-andersson-mpls-g-chng-proc-00.txt
  - From: "'Scott W Brim'" <sbrim@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-andersson-mpls-g-chng-proc-00.txt
Next by Date: RE: I-D ACTION:draft-andersson-mpls-g-chng-proc-00.txt
Previous by thread: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-andersson-mpls-g-chng-proc-00.txt
Next by thread: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-andersson-mpls-g-chng-proc-00.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread