Re: ASON reqts

["Adrian Farrel" <afarrel@movaz.com>]

> I'd like to get a reading on whether this doc is ready to be a
> CCAMP WG document.  Please respond (preferably publicly) with one of:
>  - "I have read this document and it is ready to be a CCAMP WG doc" OR
>  - "I have read this document, and it isn't ready to be a CCAMP doc".

Unless you count the authors by default...
"I have read this document and it is ready to be a CCAMP WG doc"

> Note too that this doc
> is an attempt to bridge some gaps between the IETF and the ITU-T,
> and as such is fairly important.  It would be useful to give an
> update on its status at the interim T1X1 meeting in June.

In the light of which, we would be *very* pleased to have comments from people
who participate in the ITU-T work. From my perspective I would like to know...

- Does this draft represent a fair picture of the ASON requirements?
   - Has it left anything out?
   - Has it made up requirements that aren't there?
   - Does it give the right precedence to the requirements?

- Does the draft give the right level of background without overly restating
   material that is in the ITU documents?

Thanks,
Adrian