[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: ASON reqts



[ post by non-subscriber.  with the massive amount of spam, it is easy to miss
  and therefore delete posts by non-subscribers.  if you wish to regularly
  post from an address that is not subscribed to this mailing list, send a
  message to <listname>-owner@ops.ietf.org and ask to have the alternate
  address added to the list of addresses from which submissions are
  automatically accepted. ]

Kireeti,
  I have read this document and it is ready to be a CCAMP WG doc.

Thanks,
Jonathan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kireeti Kompella
> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2003 8:25 AM
> To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: ASON reqts
> 
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> On Fri, 2 May 2003, Kireeti Kompella wrote:
> 
> > To take things one at a time, it would be very useful to read and 
> > comment on the ASON reqts draft, as this was deemed tremendously 
> > important, and a rich source of misunderstanding and 
> cross-talk; and 
> > coming to a common understanding over this should help get the IETF 
> > and the ITU working together.
> 
> I haven't seen many comments, so the assumption is either 
> that no one cares, or that folks have read it and have no issues.
> 
> I'd like to get a reading on whether this doc is ready to be 
> a CCAMP WG document.  Please respond (preferably publicly) 
> with one of:
>  - "I have read this document and it is ready to be a CCAMP WG doc" OR
>  - "I have read this document, and it isn't ready to be a CCAMP doc".
> 
> Note that if there aren't enough responses, the default 
> assumption is that the document is either not of interest or 
> not ready, and in either case will not become a CCAMP WG doc. 
>  Note too that this doc is an attempt to bridge some gaps 
> between the IETF and the ITU-T, and as such is fairly 
> important.  It would be useful to give an update on its 
> status at the interim T1X1 meeting in June.
> 
> Please get your responses in by COB Friday May 16th.
> 
> Thanks,
> Kireeti.
> 
>