[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: ASON reqts
[ post by non-subscriber. with the massive amount of spam, it is easy to miss
and therefore delete posts by non-subscribers. if you wish to regularly
post from an address that is not subscribed to this mailing list, send a
message to <listname>-owner@ops.ietf.org and ask to have the alternate
address added to the list of addresses from which submissions are
automatically accepted. ]
Kireeti,
I have read this document and it is ready to be a CCAMP WG doc.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kireeti Kompella
> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2003 8:25 AM
> To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: ASON reqts
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> On Fri, 2 May 2003, Kireeti Kompella wrote:
>
> > To take things one at a time, it would be very useful to read and
> > comment on the ASON reqts draft, as this was deemed tremendously
> > important, and a rich source of misunderstanding and
> cross-talk; and
> > coming to a common understanding over this should help get the IETF
> > and the ITU working together.
>
> I haven't seen many comments, so the assumption is either
> that no one cares, or that folks have read it and have no issues.
>
> I'd like to get a reading on whether this doc is ready to be
> a CCAMP WG document. Please respond (preferably publicly)
> with one of:
> - "I have read this document and it is ready to be a CCAMP WG doc" OR
> - "I have read this document, and it isn't ready to be a CCAMP doc".
>
> Note that if there aren't enough responses, the default
> assumption is that the document is either not of interest or
> not ready, and in either case will not become a CCAMP WG doc.
> Note too that this doc is an attempt to bridge some gaps
> between the IETF and the ITU-T, and as such is fairly
> important. It would be useful to give an update on its
> status at the interim T1X1 meeting in June.
>
> Please get your responses in by COB Friday May 16th.
>
> Thanks,
> Kireeti.
>
>