Re: ASON reqts

[Sudheer Dharanikota <sudheer@ieee.org>]

"I have read this document and it is ready to be a CCAMP WG doc"

Regards,

sudheer


Kireeti Kompella wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> On Fri, 2 May 2003, Kireeti Kompella wrote:
>
> > To take things one at a time, it would be very useful to read and comment
> > on the ASON reqts draft, as this was deemed tremendously important, and
> > a rich source of misunderstanding and cross-talk; and coming to a common
> > understanding over this should help get the IETF and the ITU working
> > together.
>
> I haven't seen many comments, so the assumption is either that no
> one cares, or that folks have read it and have no issues.
>
> I'd like to get a reading on whether this doc is ready to be a
> CCAMP WG document.  Please respond (preferably publicly) with one of:
>  - "I have read this document and it is ready to be a CCAMP WG doc" OR
>  - "I have read this document, and it isn't ready to be a CCAMP doc".
>
> Note that if there aren't enough responses, the default assumption is
> that the document is either not of interest or not ready, and in
> either case will not become a CCAMP WG doc.  Note too that this doc
> is an attempt to bridge some gaps between the IETF and the ITU-T,
> and as such is fairly important.  It would be useful to give an
> update on its status at the interim T1X1 meeting in June.
>
> Please get your responses in by COB Friday May 16th.
>
> Thanks,
> Kireeti.