RE: ITU Liaison regarding ASON Requirements Design Team

["Jonathan Lang" <Jonathan.Lang@rinconnetworks.com>]

Deborah,
  Looks good to me.

Thanks,
Jonathan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brungard, Deborah A [mailto:dbrungard@att.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 1:22 PM
> To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> Cc: kireeti@juniper.net
> Subject: ITU Liaison regarding ASON Requirements Design Team
> 
> 
> CCAMP,
> 
> The design team proposes the following ITU-T liaison on the 
> creation of the ASON Routing Requirements DT and it's 
> charter. We would like to request consensus from CCAMP for 
> forwarding this liaison to ITU-T SG15. The next meeting of 
> SG15 is Oct. 21-31. We would like to request comments by 
> October 21 to allow for this liaison to be forwarded next 
> week to SG15 (cc to Q12/15 Rapporteur, Malcolm Betts, 
> betts01@nortelnetworks.com and Q14/15 Rapporteur, Kam Lam, 
> hklam@lucent.com).
> 
> Thanks,
> Deborah
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------------------------------
> We would like to inform Q12/15 and Q14/15 that IETF CCAMP WG 
> has initiated a Design Team on GMPLS ASON Routing 
> Requirements. The GMPLS ASON Routing Requirements Design 
> Team's Charter is as follows:
> 
> "To understand the requirements for ASON routing so as to 
> capture what's missing from current CCAMP work in a "GMPLS 
> ASON Routing Requirements" document.  The ground rules are 
> the same as for ASON signaling requirements: no requirement 
> will be considered in this document that is not an ASON 
> routing requirement (as decided by those working on Questions 
> 12 and 14 of Study Group 15).  Requirements should be 
> justified briefly and prioritized. If needed, a section on 
> terminology should be included. No attempt should be made in 
> this document to do protocol design or suggest protocol extensions."
> 
> We expect to liaison to you a draft of the above WG document 
> during Nov. 2003. We wish to work with you cooperatively on 
> this document and we would appreciate your assistance in 
> reviewing this draft.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>