RE: ITU Liaison regarding ASON Requirements Design Team

[Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>]

Hi Vishal,

On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Vishal Sharma wrote:

> Hi Kireeti,
>
> Just a note to clarify that my comment was neither aimed
> at revisiting the charter of the DT, nor was it aimed at
> dictating what the ITU-T should do.
>
> And, at least I wasn't proposing any change to the wording
> of the liason statement -- merely making sure I correctly
> understood it's intent.
>
> As I mentioned in my reply to Lyndon, my query was well answered
> by Lyndon's response to it.

Great, we're all on the same page.  Thanks, Vishal and Lyndon!

Kireeti.

> -Vishal
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org]On
> > Behalf Of Kireeti Kompella
> > Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 9:45 PM
> > To: Brungard, Deborah A
> > Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> > Subject: RE: ITU Liaison regarding ASON Requirements Design Team
> >
> >
> > Hi Deborah, All:
> >
> > On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Brungard, Deborah A wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for your review. As your comment and Adrian's are related to
> > > the text of the charter itself which preceded the DT, I will concede
> > > to our Chairs for decision;-)
> >
> > The time for commenting on and tweaking the DT charter has long past.
> > I think the proposed changes, while fine, are semantic twiddling.  It
> > wouldn't be fair to the DT to spend an unbounded time revisiting their
> > charter.
> >
> > Given that the DT charter is what it is, I think the Liaison should
> > reflect that.
> >
> > Note that the ITU-T knows better than we do whether the work on ASON
> > routing requirements is done or not.  We cannot dictate that to them.
> >
> > Kireeti.