RE: ITU Liaison regarding ASON Requirements Design Team

["Vishal Sharma" <v.sharma@ieee.org>]

Hi Kireeti,

Just a note to clarify that my comment was neither aimed
at revisiting the charter of the DT, nor was it aimed at
dictating what the ITU-T should do.

And, at least I wasn't proposing any change to the wording 
of the liason statement -- merely making sure I correctly 
understood it's intent.

As I mentioned in my reply to Lyndon, my query was well answered 
by Lyndon's response to it.

-Vishal

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org]On
> Behalf Of Kireeti Kompella
> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 9:45 PM
> To: Brungard, Deborah A
> Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: ITU Liaison regarding ASON Requirements Design Team
> 
> 
> Hi Deborah, All:
> 
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Brungard, Deborah A wrote:
> 
> > Thanks for your review. As your comment and Adrian's are related to
> > the text of the charter itself which preceded the DT, I will concede
> > to our Chairs for decision;-)
> 
> The time for commenting on and tweaking the DT charter has long past.
> I think the proposed changes, while fine, are semantic twiddling.  It
> wouldn't be fair to the DT to spend an unbounded time revisiting their
> charter.
> 
> Given that the DT charter is what it is, I think the Liaison should
> reflect that.
> 
> Note that the ITU-T knows better than we do whether the work on ASON
> routing requirements is done or not.  We cannot dictate that to them.
> 
> Kireeti.
>