RE: Taking to the list:draft-berger-ccamp-gmpls-alarm-spec-00.txt

["Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS" <dbrungard@att.com>]

Thanks Bert.

M.3100 provides the generic information model, X.733 and X.736 define OSI generics pointing to X.721, and X.721 provides abstract syntax. We were looking for an enumeration to use vs. needing to support abstract syntax strings in signaling. Any suggestions are welcome.
Deborah

-----Original Message-----
From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:bwijnen@lucent.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 11:46 AM
To: Adrian Farrel; Lou Berger
Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: RE: Taking to the
list:draft-berger-ccamp-gmpls-alarm-spec-00.txt


Things to potentially look at:

  draft-ietf-disman-alarm-mib-15.txt

  [M.3100]    ITU Recommendation M.3100, "Generic Network Information
              Model", 1995

  [X.733]     ITU Recommendation X.733, "Information Technology - Open
              Systems Interconnection - System Management: Alarm
              Reporting Function", 1992

  [X.736]     ITU Recommendation X.736, "Information Technology - Open
              Systems Interconnection - System Management: Security
              Alarm Reporting Function", 1992

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk]
> Sent: dinsdag 11 november 2003 17:28
> To: Lou Berger
> Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Taking to the
> list:draft-berger-ccamp-gmpls-alarm-spec-00.txt
> 
> 
> Lou,
> 
> I believe the alarm reference was M.3100.
> 
> Can someone confirm?
> 
> Adrian
> 
> 
> > In the morning's meeting the AD's asked to bring the proposed Alarm 
> > communication extension to "the list".  For today's 
> presentation see:
> > http://www.labn.net/docs/AlarmSpec00.pdf
> > 
> > I believe the issues to be discussed are:
> > 1) Is there general interest in this work?
> > 2) Should the usage of new TLVs in Error_Spec be permitted?
> >          (We think there's some value, particularly with string
> >           and timestamp)
> > 3) Are there good references for alarm code points?
> > 
> > Thank,
> > Lou (and co-authors)
> 
>