RE: Taking to the list:draft-berger-ccamp-gmpls-alarm-spec-00.txt

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

Things to potentially look at:

  draft-ietf-disman-alarm-mib-15.txt

  [M.3100]    ITU Recommendation M.3100, "Generic Network Information
              Model", 1995

  [X.733]     ITU Recommendation X.733, "Information Technology - Open
              Systems Interconnection - System Management: Alarm
              Reporting Function", 1992

  [X.736]     ITU Recommendation X.736, "Information Technology - Open
              Systems Interconnection - System Management: Security
              Alarm Reporting Function", 1992

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk]
> Sent: dinsdag 11 november 2003 17:28
> To: Lou Berger
> Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Taking to the
> list:draft-berger-ccamp-gmpls-alarm-spec-00.txt
> 
> 
> Lou,
> 
> I believe the alarm reference was M.3100.
> 
> Can someone confirm?
> 
> Adrian
> 
> 
> > In the morning's meeting the AD's asked to bring the proposed Alarm 
> > communication extension to "the list".  For today's 
> presentation see:
> > http://www.labn.net/docs/AlarmSpec00.pdf
> > 
> > I believe the issues to be discussed are:
> > 1) Is there general interest in this work?
> > 2) Should the usage of new TLVs in Error_Spec be permitted?
> >          (We think there's some value, particularly with string
> >           and timestamp)
> > 3) Are there good references for alarm code points?
> > 
> > Thank,
> > Lou (and co-authors)
> 
>