Non-member submission from ["Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>] : Taking to the list:draft-berger-ccamp-gmpls-alarm-spec-00.txt

["Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>]

> Hi -
>
> > From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
> > To: "Tom Petch" <nwnetworks@dial.pipex.com>; "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)"
<bwijnen@lucent.com>
> > Cc: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>; "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 7:59 AM
> > Subject: RE: Taking to the list:draft-berger-ccamp-gmpls-alarm-spec-00.txt
> >
>
> > I believe thatthe codepoints we are talking about are not
> > under discussion. Add those are in a TC that is in a
> > separate MIB module in that document and the intent is
> > that IANA (see start of module on page 36) will maintain
> > that module and keep it in sync with ITU-T (in fact values under
> > 1024 are reserved for ITU-T).
> >
> > Hope this clarifies.
> ...
>
> Bert's summary is correct.  Disman is wrapping up the discussion
> of the review comments on draft-ietf-disman-alarm-mib-15.txt,
> and has made no structural changes.  There have been a lot
> of clarifications and some minor tweaks, such as handling of
> out-of-memory conditions, but nothing drastic.
>
> I think it would be very interesting to describe how alarm information
> communicated using the mechanisms described in
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-berger-ccamp-gmpls-alarm-spec-00.txt
> would be represented in the alarm MIB.  However, I do not think that
> it would make sense to wait for such an analysis to be completed
> before handing the alarm MIB to the IESG, particularly since the
> alarm report control document is in the RFC editor queue at this time.
> Comments on possible mappings between the ccamp alarms and
> the alarm MIB would be welcome on the disman@ietf.org mailing list,
> and would be taken into account  when the time comes to revisit the
> alarm MIB, or, if there is sufficient need and support, as an extension
> model.  Of course, actually chartering such work would be up to the AD.
>
> Randy Presuhn
> disman WG chair
>
>
>
>
>