IESG Comments: <draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-wdm-02.txt>

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

CCAMPers and LMP editors/authors,

I should have seen the below in my AD review. 
Appology that I missed it.

... snip ...

The IANA considerations is not very clear indeed. It was
perceived by IANA (and others) to establish YET another
namespace. The good news is that it does NOT specify a new
namespace. In fact it requests allocation in an existing
namespace as defined in draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-10.txt, which
was approved on Oct 17th.
The latter doc does have the appropriate IANA instructions.

So this one can be fixed with:

OLD:
  6. IANA Considerations
  
   LMP defines the following name spaces that require management:

   - LMP Message Type.
   - LMP Object Class.
   - LMP Object Class type (C-Type) unique within the Object Class.
   - LMP Sub-object Class type (Type) unique within the Object Class.

   This memo introduces the following name spaces which need
   assignment:

      o CONFIG
        - LMP-WDM_CONFIG       (suggested C-Type = 2)

      o CHANNEL_STATUS
        - LINK_GROUP           (suggested C-Type = 4)

   LMP sub-object Class type (C-Type) should be assigned from the range
   0-127.

      o DATA_LINK
        - Link_GroupId         (suggested sub-object Type = 3)
        - SRLG                 (suggested sub-object Type = 4)
        - BER_Estimate         (suggested sub-object Type = 5)
        - Optical_Protection   (suggested sub-object Type = 6)
        - Total_Span_Length    (suggested sub-object Type = 7)
        - Administrative_Group (suggested sub-object Type = 8)

NEW:
   LMP [LMP] defines the following name spaces and how IANA can
   make assignments in those namespaces:

   - LMP Message Type.
   - LMP Object Class.
   - LMP Object Class type (C-Type) unique within the Object Class.
   - LMP Sub-object Class type (Type) unique within the Object Class.

   This memo introduces the following new assignments:

   LMP Object Class Types:

      o under CONFIG class name (as defined in [LMP]):
        - LMP-WDM_CONFIG       (suggested C-Type = 2)

      o uncer CHANNEL_STATUS class name (as defined in [LMP]):
        - LINK_GROUP           (suggested C-Type = 4)

   LMP Sub-object Class names:

      o under DATA-LINK Class name (as defined in [LMP]), Sub-object
        Class names should be assigned from the range 0-127:
        - Link_GroupId         (suggested sub-object Type = 3)
        - SRLG                 (suggested sub-object Type = 4)
        - BER_Estimate         (suggested sub-object Type = 5)
        - Optical_Protection   (suggested sub-object Type = 6)
        - Total_Span_Length    (suggested sub-object Type = 7)
        - Administrative_Group (suggested sub-object Type = 8)

Pls check and if you agree, I propose to quickly spin a new rev,

Same story for: <draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-test-sonet-sdh-03.txt>

Bert
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michelle S. Cotton [mailto:cotton@icann.org]
> Sent: donderdag 4 december 2003 16:35
> To: Bert Wijnen (Bert)
> Cc: iesg@ietf.org
> Subject: Comments: <draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-wdm-02.txt>
> 
> 
> Bert,
> 
> In reviewing the IANA Considerations for this document,
> there needs to be more clarification.
> 
> This appears to be a new registry to be set-up.
> There is no mention of how new registrations can be made
> and what range the registry is.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Michelle