RE: IESG Comments: <draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-wdm-02.txt>

["Jonathan Lang" <Jonathan.Lang@rinconnetworks.com>]

Thanks Bert,
  I have made the changes and uploaded the -03 version.  I also noticed
draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-test-sonet-sdh-03.txt needed the same edits, so
I've updated/uploaded that draft as -04.

Thanks,
Jonathan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 5:03 PM
> To: Ccamp-wg (E-mail)
> Subject: IESG Comments: <draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-wdm-02.txt>
> 
> CCAMPers and LMP editors/authors,
> 
> I should have seen the below in my AD review. 
> Appology that I missed it.
> 
> ... snip ...
> 
> The IANA considerations is not very clear indeed. It was 
> perceived by IANA (and others) to establish YET another 
> namespace. The good news is that it does NOT specify a new 
> namespace. In fact it requests allocation in an existing 
> namespace as defined in draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-10.txt, which 
> was approved on Oct 17th.
> The latter doc does have the appropriate IANA instructions.
> 
> So this one can be fixed with:
> 
> OLD
>   6. IANA Considerations
>   
>    LMP defines the following name spaces that require management:
> 
>    - LMP Message Type.
>    - LMP Object Class.
>    - LMP Object Class type (C-Type) unique within the Object Class.
>    - LMP Sub-object Class type (Type) unique within the Object Class.
> 
>    This memo introduces the following name spaces which need
>    assignment:
> 
>       o CONFIG
>         - LMP-WDM_CONFIG       (suggested C-Type = 2)
> 
>       o CHANNEL_STATUS
>         - LINK_GROUP           (suggested C-Type = 4)
> 
>    LMP sub-object Class type (C-Type) should be assigned from 
> the range
>    0-127.
> 
>       o DATA_LINK
>         - Link_GroupId         (suggested sub-object Type = 3)
>         - SRLG                 (suggested sub-object Type = 4)
>         - BER_Estimate         (suggested sub-object Type = 5)
>         - Optical_Protection   (suggested sub-object Type = 6)
>         - Total_Span_Length    (suggested sub-object Type = 7)
>         - Administrative_Group (suggested sub-object Type = 8)
> 
> NEW:
>    LMP [LMP] defines the following name spaces and how IANA can
>    make assignments in those namespaces:
> 
>    - LMP Message Type.
>    - LMP Object Class.
>    - LMP Object Class type (C-Type) unique within the Object Class.
>    - LMP Sub-object Class type (Type) unique within the Object Class.
> 
>    This memo introduces the following new assignments:
> 
>    LMP Object Class Types:
> 
>       o under CONFIG class name (as defined in [LMP]):
>         - LMP-WDM_CONFIG       (suggested C-Type = 2)
> 
>       o uncer CHANNEL_STATUS class name (as defined in [LMP]):
>         - LINK_GROUP           (suggested C-Type = 4)
> 
>    LMP Sub-object Class names:
> 
>       o under DATA-LINK Class name (as defined in [LMP]), Sub-object
>         Class names should be assigned from the range 0-127:
>         - Link_GroupId         (suggested sub-object Type = 3)
>         - SRLG                 (suggested sub-object Type = 4)
>         - BER_Estimate         (suggested sub-object Type = 5)
>         - Optical_Protection   (suggested sub-object Type = 6)
>         - Total_Span_Length    (suggested sub-object Type = 7)
>         - Administrative_Group (suggested sub-object Type = 8)
> 
> Pls check and if you agree, I propose to quickly spin a new rev,
> 
> Same story for: <draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-test-sonet-sdh-03.txt>
> 
> Bert
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michelle S. Cotton [mailto:cotton@icann.org]
> > Sent: donderdag 4 december 2003 16:35
> > To: Bert Wijnen (Bert)
> > Cc: iesg@ietf.org
> > Subject: Comments: <draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-wdm-02.txt>
> > 
> > 
> > Bert,
> > 
> > In reviewing the IANA Considerations for this document, 
> there needs to 
> > be more clarification.
> > 
> > This appears to be a new registry to be set-up.
> > There is no mention of how new registrations can be made and what 
> > range the registry is.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Michelle
> 
>