the "draft" is in the RFC Editor queue and blocked due to a reference to [GMPLS-ARCH] otherwise it should have been out now with an RFC number.
Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be wrote:
to what *change* do you refer here, when you say
" If not, at least, isn't it a good idea to let the WG know the rational reason behind changing the proposed value in the draft ?"
The SENDER_TSPEC/FLOWSPEC values were always mentioned as TBA and value 3 has never been reserved -
The value 3 was specified for the old RSVP-TE draft.
Yes, there was no value specified in the GMPLS-SONET/SDH draft.
So how did IANA assign a value? And why did they choose to assign a value to this draft, when they aren't assigning values to other important drafts (like DiffServ-TE)?
-- David
-- Papadimitriou Dimitri E-mail : dimitri.papadimitriou@alcatel.be E-mail : dpapadimitriou@psg.com Webpage: http://psg.com/~dpapadimitriou/ Address: Fr. Wellesplein 1, B-2018 Antwerpen, Belgium Phone : +32 3 240-8491