Re: IANA assignments

[Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be]

kireeti, historically value 4 has been considered for the
TSPEC/FLOWSPEC, so this value has been used for our main
implementation (started before the official IANA value
assignment)

note: it would be of interest to reach rapidly agreement
on this since from my side any development initiated/
started after this consider the use the value assigned by
IANA

thanks,
- dimitri.

Kireeti Kompella wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Kireeti Kompella wrote:
>
>
> > Okay, in order to come to some conclusion here, those of you who have
> > implemented RSVP-TE and/or GMPLS RSVP-TE please answer the following:
>
>
> <WG chair hat OFF>
>
> For the record, here is the answer from Juniper's implementation:
>
>
> > a) do you use the FLOWSPEC C-Type 3 for CoS?
>
>
> We parse this, but don't really use it.
>
>
> > b) have you implemented the SONET/SDH FLOWSPEC?  If so, what value did
> >   you use for the C-Type?
>
>
> Yes. Value 4.
>
>
> > c) do you use the TSPEC C-Type 3 for CoS?
>
>
> We parse this, but don't really use it.
>
>
> > d) have you implemented the SONET/SDH TSPEC?  If so, what value did
> >   you use for the C-Type?
>
>
> Yes. Value 4.
>
> Kireeti.
> -------

--
Papadimitriou Dimitri
E-mail : dimitri.papadimitriou@alcatel.be
E-mail : dpapadimitriou@psg.com
Webpage: http://psg.com/~dpapadimitriou/
Address: Fr. Wellesplein 1, B-2018 Antwerpen, Belgium
Phone  : +32 3 240-8491