RE: Opinion sought on drafts being adopted by CCAMP

["Vishal Sharma" <v.sharma@ieee.org>]

Adrian,

Opinions in-line. (Some of the drafts need more discussion and socializing
on the list, before we can determine whether they are ready to be
made CCAMP WG documents.)

-Vishal

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org]On
> Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 3:46 AM
> To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Opinion sought on drafts being adopted by CCAMP
>
>
> All,
>
> At the CCAMP meeting today we discussed making several drafts
> working group items. Can you
> please express your opinion (yes/no) on whether each of the
> following drafts is ready to
> become a CCAMP working group draft.
>
> Feel free to express yes with reservations. If you have
> reservations or objections, please
> express them on the list. if you need anonymity for your comments
> then please filter them
> through the chairs.
>
> Silence will be taken as meaning nothing, so please say what you think.
>
> GMPLS Signaling Procedure For Egress Control
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-berger-gmpls-egress-cont
> rol-01.txt

Yes.

> Generic Tunnel Tracing Protocol (GTTP) Specification
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bonica-tunproto-05.txt

Yes.
> RSVP-TE Extensions in support of End-to-End GMPLS-based Recovery
>
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lang-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-e2e-sign
aling-03.txt

No.

GMPLS Based Segment Recovery
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-berger-ccamp-gmpls-segment-recover
y-00.txt

No.