Re: Opinion sought on drafts being adopted by CCAMP

["Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>]

Thanks Vishal,

If you have issues or concerns about these drafts I'd appreciate it if you would raise
them on the list.
draft-lang-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-e2e-signaling is over 18 months old, so no-one can claim
unseemly haste!

Please note that adoption as a WG draft means
- the draft addresses a WG charter item
- the direction of the draft is approximately right
- the WG feels that this is something they want to work on

It does not mean that this draft is perfect and ready to become an RFC tomorrow.

Thanks,
Adrian

> Opinions in-line. (Some of the drafts need more discussion and socializing
> on the list, before we can determine whether they are ready to be
> made CCAMP WG documents.)
>
> > RSVP-TE Extensions in support of End-to-End GMPLS-based Recovery
> >
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lang-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-e2e-signaling-03.txt
>
> No.
>
> GMPLS Based Segment Recovery
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-berger-ccamp-gmpls-segment-recovery-00.txt
>
> No.