RE: [RE] Layer One VPNs - sorry for the previous email

["zafar ali" <zali@cisco.com>]

Title: Message

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of yhwkim@etri.re.kr
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 3:40 AM
To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: [RE] Layer One VPNs - sorry for the previous email

Hi,
I think the framework document has good guidelins for realizing the L1VPN in the GMPLS networks.  

Yes, I agree the framework document is a good start.

 
I'm not sure that the L1VPN service itself could be included in the CCAMP charter or not, but
I think functional enhancements for supporting the L1VPN in GMPLS should be covered in the CCAMP.  

There were also talks about creating a new WG for it. Considering current work load at CCAMP, this may be a sensible option. I hope we are able to clarify on home for this work soon.

Thanks

 

Regards... Zafar

 
Thanks,
Young

> Hi,
> Although Layer One VPNs do not currently have a home in any IETF working group, we were
> the recipients of a liaison from ITU-T SG13 informing us about the work they are doing on
> this topic and pointing us at
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-takeda-l1vpn-framework-00.txt
> If anyone has comments on this work they can send them to this mailing list (until another
> home is found in the IETF) or to the authors direct.
> Thanks,
> Adrian