RE: [RE] Layer One VPNs - sorry for the previous email

[Tomonori TAKEDA <takeda.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>]

Hi, Zafar,

Thank you for your comments.

Technically, GMPLS protocols seem to have many common pieces for the L1VPN 
as suggested by some of the voices during the CCAMP meeting.

Any suggestion ?

Best regards,

At 17:09 04/03/15 -0500, zafar ali wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf 
> Of yhwkim@etri.re.kr
> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 3:40 AM
> To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: [RE] Layer One VPNs - sorry for the previous email
> Hi,
> I think the framework document has good guidelins for realizing the L1VPN 
> in the GMPLS networks.
> Yes, I agree the framework document is a good start.
>
> I'm not sure that the L1VPN service itself could be included in the CCAMP 
> charter or not, but
> I think functional enhancements for supporting the L1VPN in GMPLS should 
> be covered in the CCAMP.
> There were also talks about creating a new WG for it. Considering current 
> work load at CCAMP, this may be a sensible option. I hope we are able to 
> clarify on home for this work soon.
> Thanks
>
> Regards... Zafar
>
>
> Thanks,
> Young
>
> > Hi,
> > Although Layer One VPNs do not currently have a home in any IETF 
> working group, we were
> > the recipients of a liaison from ITU-T SG13 informing us about the 
> work they are doing on
> > this topic and pointing us at
> > 
> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-takeda-l1vpn-framework-00.txt>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-takeda-l1vpn-framework-00.txt 
>
> > If anyone has comments on this work they can send them to this 
> mailing list (until another
> > home is found in the IETF) or to the authors direct.
> > Thanks,
> > Adrian

-----
Tomonori TAKEDA
NTT Network Service Systems Lab.
Phone: +81-422-59-7434